Guides
Is Otter AI safe? A plain look at Otter AI privacy
Otter is a well-established cloud service with the usual security certifications, so for everyday meetings it's as safe as most online tools. The questions to think about are that your recordings live on Otter's servers, its privacy policy allows training its AI on de-identified audio and transcripts, and it is being sued over its meeting bot recording people without their consent.
This guide sticks to what Otter's own pages say and what is on the public record, so you can decide for yourself. We make a competing product, Hark, and we say so up front. Everything below about Otter is linked to its source; we checked those pages in October 2026.
How Otter handles your data
Otter is a cloud service. When it records a meeting, whether through its notetaker bot, its desktop app or its phone app, the audio goes to Otter's servers, where it's transcribed, summarized and stored. That's what makes features like search, sharing and AI chat across your conversations possible. Here's what Otter's privacy policy (effective June 16, 2026) says about the parts most people care about.
What it collects
- Audio recordings and the transcripts made from them.
- Automatic screenshots of virtual meetings, taken by its notetaker.
- Speaker identification information, used to tag names in transcripts.
- Account details, device and usage data, approximate location from your IP address.
- Calendar and contact information from apps you connect, such as Google Calendar or Zoom.
AI training
The policy says Otter trains its AI on "de-identified audio recordings and on transcriptions (which may contain Personal Information)." It lists data labeling providers among the vendors that receive data to create training and evaluation data. The policy doesn't explain how de-identification works or describe a dedicated opt-out switch for training, beyond your general right to withdraw consent. If this matters to you, check your account and workspace settings and ask Otter in writing what applies to your plan.
Where it's stored and who sees it
- Data is stored with US-based cloud providers, including Amazon Web Services. For EU, UK and Swiss users, Otter relies on the Data Privacy Framework and standard contractual clauses.
- Vendors that receive data include cloud hosts, AI service providers, data labeling services, and analytics providers such as Google and Amplitude.
- The policy says some sharing of device, cookie and location data with advertising and analytics partners may count as a "sale" under some US state laws, and offers a "Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information" link to opt out.
- Data is kept "for as long as necessary" for the purposes in the policy; it doesn't give fixed retention periods.
Security certifications
Otter's trust center lists SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA, VPAT and TX-RAMP Level 2, with a SOC 2 report available. Certifications show that an auditor checked Otter's security controls. They don't change what the privacy policy allows Otter to do with your data.
The Otter privacy lawsuit
On August 15, 2025, Justin Brewer filed a proposed class action against Otter.ai in the US District Court for the Northern District of California (case 5:25-cv-06911). According to coverage of the complaint, Brewer was not an Otter user and says he was recorded in a Zoom meeting by Otter's notetaker. The suit claims Otter recorded participants without everyone's consent and used the conversations to train its models.
The case was combined with similar suits as In re Otter.AI Privacy Litigation. As law firm ZwillGen summarizes, the plaintiffs also object to voiceprints made to identify speakers and argue that Otter's policy improperly puts the duty to get consent on its customers. In 2026, the court allowed several core claims (under the federal Wiretap Act, California's Invasion of Privacy Act and Illinois' biometric privacy law) to go forward, as Baird Holm reported.
Important context: these are allegations. Nothing has been proven, and Otter disputes the claims; it has argued it provides a service at the direction of the account holder or meeting host. The case was still pending when we checked in October 2026.
How to use Otter more safely
- Check auto-join. If your calendar is connected, decide which meetings the notetaker joins instead of letting it join all of them.
- Check auto-share. Review who receives notes and transcripts after a meeting.
- Tell people. Announce that you're recording at the start, and stop if anyone objects.
- Look for data settings. Review the data and privacy controls in your account, and use the "Do Not Sell or Share" link if you want.
- Delete what you don't need. Old recordings you no longer use are still stored until you delete them.
- Ask your employer. Many companies have rules about which AI note takers are approved for client or confidential calls.
Keep your meetings on your own computer
Hark records without a bot and transcribes on your computer, so audio isn't uploaded for transcription. Free forever; optional AI notes send only transcript text to Claude.
Questions to ask any AI note taker
Otter isn't unusual: most AI note takers are cloud services with similar policies. Before you trust any of them with sensitive calls, get clear answers to these:
- Where is the audio transcribed? On my device, or on your servers or a third party's?
- Do you keep the audio? For how long, and can I delete it permanently?
- Do you train AI on my meetings? Is it on by default, and is there a clear opt-out?
- Which other companies see my data? Transcription providers, AI model providers, analytics, advertisers?
- How do other people in the meeting find out? Is there a bot, a notice, or nothing at all?
- Do you make voiceprints? Some places treat voiceprints as biometric data with special rules.
- Can you sign the agreements I need? For example a data processing agreement, or a HIPAA business associate agreement for health information.
How local note takers like Hark differ
A local note taker does the heavy lifting on your own computer. Hark, for example:
- Records on your computer, with no bot. It captures your microphone and your computer's audio, so nothing joins the call. That also means it's on you to tell people you're recording.
- Transcribes on your computer. Speech recognition (an NVIDIA Parakeet model) runs locally. Audio is not uploaded for transcription. We explain how this works in our local AI transcription guide.
- Keeps recordings, transcripts and voiceprints on your computer unless you turn on sync, which encrypts them on your computer before upload.
- Doesn't train AI on your meetings.
To be equally clear about the limits: Hark's AI features (meeting notes, titles, proofreading, live notes) send the transcript text, not the audio, to Claude by Anthropic through External Software's service. If you only use the free features, nothing is sent anywhere. Hark has no SOC 2, HIPAA or other certifications. It transcribes English only, and on a Mac it records the microphone only. Local tools also put backups and device security in your hands.
If you want to keep the convenience of a cloud tool, read our Otter vs Fireflies comparison. If you'd rather avoid bots and the cloud, see our list of Otter alternatives or the guide to an AI note taker without a bot.
A note on recording consent
Recording laws vary. Some US states and many countries require everyone in a conversation to agree before it's recorded. Whatever tool you use, tell people at the start and get their consent. This guide isn't legal advice.
Related
- Otter.ai alternatives Why people switch from Otter and what to use instead.
- AI note takers without a bot Take AI meeting notes without a bot joining the call.
- Local AI transcription How on-device speech recognition works, and the trade-offs.
- Otter vs Fireflies Otter and Fireflies side by side, and who should pick which.
- Fathom vs Otter Fathom and Otter compared on features, privacy and price.
- Granola vs Otter Bot-free Granola against bot-based Otter.
Frequently asked questions
Is Otter AI safe to use? +
Otter is a mainstream cloud service, and its trust center lists SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR and CCPA. The main privacy questions are that your recordings are stored on Otter's servers, its privacy policy allows training its AI on de-identified audio and transcripts, and it faces a pending class action over recording people without consent. Whether that is safe enough depends on what your meetings contain.
Does Otter AI use my recordings to train its AI? +
Otter's privacy policy, effective June 16, 2026, says it trains its AI on de-identified audio recordings and on transcriptions, which may contain personal information. It also says it shares data with data labeling providers to create training data. Check your account and workspace settings and ask Otter directly if you need a firm commitment.
Can other people see my Otter transcripts? +
People you share a conversation with can see it, and Otter's notetaker can share notes with meeting participants depending on your settings. Review your sharing and auto-share settings, especially if your calendar is connected and the notetaker joins meetings automatically.
Is Otter AI being sued? +
Yes. A class action filed in August 2025 in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, now called In re Otter.AI Privacy Litigation, alleges that Otter recorded meeting participants without consent and used the recordings to train its models. These are allegations, not findings. In 2026 the court allowed several of the core claims to move forward.
Is there a private alternative to Otter? +
Local tools keep the recording and transcript on your own computer. Hark, for example, records without a bot and transcribes in English on your computer for free, so audio is not uploaded for transcription. Its optional AI notes do send transcript text to Claude.
Record, transcribe and remember every meeting
Hark records your calls on your own computer, transcribes them privately, and learns who is speaking. Free forever, with a 2-day preview of AI meeting notes.